"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;......"
***********************************
For those of you who were educationally abused in our sham of a public school system, the above is the Estabishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment . It is one of the most important thoughts ever recorded in human history. This tiny little sentence fragment of a mere sixteen words makes America....well, American.
See, ladies and gentlemen, the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses do more than protect religion from the intrigues of government, regardless of what the commies at the ACLU would have you believe. The Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses protect the individual's right to think for himself, since following a religion is the most personal (and important) decision an individual will ever make in his lifetime.
Chairman Obama's recent attempt to force the Catholic Church to pay for contraception is more than a malicious, bigoted attack on religion. (Which is horrying in itself, might I add.) It is an attack on the individual spirit. It is using the power of the State to impose its own warped version of morality onto the individual, which is a tactic of choice for genocidal maniacs the world over. Lenin did it, Hitler did it, Stalin did it, and Mao did it. Millions died horrible deaths because they did.
And now, our President Barack Hussein Obama, is attepting to do it.
This cannot stand. If you have the least bit of a desire for freedom, you must oppose this. I don't care if you're Catholic or Protestant. It doesn't really matter if you're a Jew of the Sephardim or Ashkenazim variety, or whether or not you're Greek Orthodox, (No, I didn't forget a certain religion. It's the only one The Regime finds acceptable, and is therefore safe.) you must fight this or any other version CONgress comes up with with every fiber of your being.
The right of you to be you is at stake.
Friday, February 17, 2012
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Mitt Trotsky
Recently, "Republican" presidential wanna-be Mitt Romney had this to say to the Communist News Network's Soledad O'Brien:
************************************
"And, by the way, I’m in this race because I care about Americans. I’m not concerned about the very poor; we have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich; they’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling."
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/mitt-romney-to-soledad-obrien-im-not-concerned-about-the-very-poor/
***********************************
Now, of course, the arrogant and lazy media focused on the " I’m not concerned about the very poor; we have a safety net there" part. Keith Olbermann wet himself in defiance. An outraged Rachel Maddcow got her udders in a knot. Chrissy Matthews got blitzed. Needless to say, the arrogant and lazy media acted as if Romney was......well, a Conservative Republican.
And, once again, the arrogant and lazy media lost the plot. Mitt Trotsky is NOT a Conservative. Mitt Trotsky is a NOT a Republican. Mitt Trotsky is a collectivist, just like media's hero Chairman Obama. Let's focus on the part where Mitt gives himself away: ".... we have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it....".
Okay, I'll bite. How will the Mittster go about fixing the safety hammock ?
Will Mitt Trotsky:
Given Mitt Trotsky's past, with Romneycare and his "independent progressive" phase, these questions should be asked, if not by me, at least by the "Conservatives" who follow him like Ann Coulter and Matt Drudge. Well Ann ? Matt ? Speak up, please. I can't hear you over the crickets....Matt ? Ann ? Comments ? How about you, Krispy Kreme Christie ? (H/T Mark Levin) Can you put down that cannolli long enough to answer ? Buehler..... Buehler....Anyone ? Anyone ?
Ladies and gentlemen, the bottom line is this: The United States is on the edge of economic and political disaster. The only thing that will save the country is the "In Your Face" Conservatism of Ronald Reagan. We the People don't need a "managed decay", to paraphrase Newt Gingrich. We need a solution.
That solution sure as hell ain't Mitt Trotsky.
************************************
"And, by the way, I’m in this race because I care about Americans. I’m not concerned about the very poor; we have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich; they’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling."
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/mitt-romney-to-soledad-obrien-im-not-concerned-about-the-very-poor/
***********************************
Now, of course, the arrogant and lazy media focused on the " I’m not concerned about the very poor; we have a safety net there" part. Keith Olbermann wet himself in defiance. An outraged Rachel Maddcow got her udders in a knot. Chrissy Matthews got blitzed. Needless to say, the arrogant and lazy media acted as if Romney was......well, a Conservative Republican.
And, once again, the arrogant and lazy media lost the plot. Mitt Trotsky is NOT a Conservative. Mitt Trotsky is a NOT a Republican. Mitt Trotsky is a collectivist, just like media's hero Chairman Obama. Let's focus on the part where Mitt gives himself away: ".... we have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it....".
Okay, I'll bite. How will the Mittster go about fixing the safety hammock ?
Will Mitt Trotsky:
- raise taxes and redistribute wealth ? Will he pretend that "from each according to his abilities to each according to his need" is in the Constitution like Chairman Obama does ?
- have the Federal Reserve print up a big ol' batch of funny money ?
- borrow more money from our Chinese overlords ?
Given Mitt Trotsky's past, with Romneycare and his "independent progressive" phase, these questions should be asked, if not by me, at least by the "Conservatives" who follow him like Ann Coulter and Matt Drudge. Well Ann ? Matt ? Speak up, please. I can't hear you over the crickets....Matt ? Ann ? Comments ? How about you, Krispy Kreme Christie ? (H/T Mark Levin) Can you put down that cannolli long enough to answer ? Buehler..... Buehler....Anyone ? Anyone ?
Ladies and gentlemen, the bottom line is this: The United States is on the edge of economic and political disaster. The only thing that will save the country is the "In Your Face" Conservatism of Ronald Reagan. We the People don't need a "managed decay", to paraphrase Newt Gingrich. We need a solution.
That solution sure as hell ain't Mitt Trotsky.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Let's Talk About Fairness
************************************
"But in return, we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of Members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes. Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule: If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes. And my Republican friend Tom Coburn is right: Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires. In fact, if you're earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn't get special tax subsidies or deductions. On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldn't go up. You're the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages. You're the ones who need relief.
Now, you can call this class warfare all you want. But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.
We don't begrudge financial success in this country. We admire it. When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, it's not because they envy the rich. It's because they understand that when I get tax breaks I don't need and the country can't afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference - like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet. That's not right. Americans know it's not right. "
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/24/transcript-obamas-2012-state-union/#ixzz1kWyslqE2
***********************************
You know what, Barry ? You're right for a change. We should have a talk (or in your lingo, a "national dialogue") about fairness. Ready ? Well, that's too bad. You work for me, not the other way around.
Is it fair that 47% of Americans pay nothing in federal taxes while the other 53% do ? Is it fair that Americans are forced to pay into the insolvent Socialist Security and Mediscare Ponzi schemes against their will ? Is it fair that a brilliant neurosurgeon pays a higher tax rate than a drug addict working part time at McDonald's ? Is it fair when taxpayers are forced to fund the retirements of bureaucrats ?
While we're on the subject of fairness, was it fair with millions out of work, that our "President" had a Halloween party decorated by Tim Burton ? Was it fair that while the Gulf Coast was drowning in oil, Reichsfuhrer Obama decided to have a sing along with Paul McCartney ? Was it fair that our Fearless Leader found time to play 90 rounds of golf while Americans were fighting and dying in Afghanistan ?
Tell us, Chairman Obama what's fair about any of this ? We the People would really, really like to know.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Leftist Lunacy
Is it me or is the left full of schizophrenics that are in desperate need of a refill ?
Now understand, I'm not not just being my usual sarcastic, childish self. (If I were, I'd have tossed Ron Paul's whack job supporters in the opening sentence.) I am making an honest intellectual inquiry. Is the left full of schizophrenics ?
I ask this because the Left is always in a chaotic state of flux. One minute they're attempting to regulate how much water my toilet uses and the next minute they're raping and pillaging at Occupy Wall Street. One minute they hate capitalism, the next minute they want to create "high paying green jobs". One minute they despise war and American "imperialism" and the next minute they're cheering because Chairman Obama and NATO have helped the Muslim Brotherhood take over Libya in a bloody revolution.
It's enough to make you scream "Oy veh!" to the heavens. (That's right, I said "oy veh". Wanna make something of it Daily Paul ? How about you, Pitchfork Pat ?) You never know which one of Sybil's personalities you'll get when dealing with the Left. Will you get Allan Colmes who can bore librarians to death or will you get an Occupy Wall Street fleabagger high on meth and throwing bricks ?
Michael Savage was right. Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.
Now understand, I'm not not just being my usual sarcastic, childish self. (If I were, I'd have tossed Ron Paul's whack job supporters in the opening sentence.) I am making an honest intellectual inquiry. Is the left full of schizophrenics ?
I ask this because the Left is always in a chaotic state of flux. One minute they're attempting to regulate how much water my toilet uses and the next minute they're raping and pillaging at Occupy Wall Street. One minute they hate capitalism, the next minute they want to create "high paying green jobs". One minute they despise war and American "imperialism" and the next minute they're cheering because Chairman Obama and NATO have helped the Muslim Brotherhood take over Libya in a bloody revolution.
It's enough to make you scream "Oy veh!" to the heavens. (That's right, I said "oy veh". Wanna make something of it Daily Paul ? How about you, Pitchfork Pat ?) You never know which one of Sybil's personalities you'll get when dealing with the Left. Will you get Allan Colmes who can bore librarians to death or will you get an Occupy Wall Street fleabagger high on meth and throwing bricks ?
Michael Savage was right. Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.
Saturday, November 5, 2011
It'sTime For The National Guard To Bust Some Skulls
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to commit rape.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to deal dope.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to steal.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to trash a Whole Foods store.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to "occupy" a public place.
-----------------------------------
I'm going to say something that some may find controversial. I'm going to say something that should have been said weeks ago. I'm going to say what needs to be said about the "Occupy Wall Street" barbarians, consequences be damned, criticism be damned.
It's time for the National Guard to come in and bust some skulls.
Let me repeat that so there is no misunderstanding:
It's time for the National Guard to come in and bust some skulls.
I know, I know. I'm a reactionary. I'm an old fart. Blah, blah, blah, 2+2=5, yadda, yadda, yadda, I'm a Zionist tool of the Federal Reserve, yeah, yeah, I got it.
See folks, the truth of the matter is this: the "Occupy" movement is NOT a political protest in any way, shape, or form. It's a civil disturbance. It may be the slowest populist riot in world history, but it's a riot nonetheless. The "Occupy Wall Street" protests must be shut down. Obviously, peacefully shutting down the protests is preferable, but if that's not possible, force should be used. (Whether liberals like Chairman Obama and Ron Paul like it or not.)
I know there will be some who will say I'm playing partisan games. After all, I'm a Constitutional Conservative Patriot and the bottom feeders in the "Occupy" movement are leftist piles of human debris. That's not the case at all. I'm not saying the "Occupy" movement should be stopped because of their beliefs. (Most of them are too stoned to know why they're there in the first place.) Communists, anarchists, and Nazis have held rallies in the US for decades and have never gained any traction since the US is a center-right Conservative country. I have no fear of these morons spreading propaganda or influencing the 2012 election. America has been down this road many times. There was the Socialist and anarchist movements in the late 1800's and early 1900's. There was the Communist Movement in the 1930's. There were the Nazi Bundists in the 1940's. The Weather Underground, led by Chairman Obama's ghost writer Bill Ayers, created all kinds of Marxist-Leninist havoc in the 1960's and early 1970's. None of these movements gained steam back then, just like the "Occupy" twits won't gain any now. Their beliefs don't bother me.
Their actions do.
From the "official" Occupy Wall Street website:
-----------------------------------
"Sign up for the eviction defense text blast!
Send a text to the number 23559, with the the message @occupyalert
This will be used for emergency alerts and announcements.
Three weeks ago NYPD delivered what was effectively a notice of eviction, telling residents of Liberty Square that Brookfield, with the help of the city, was going to clean the park. Instead, #OWS mobilized, organizing a mass clean up, mobilizing thousands of supporters, and flooding the mayors office with phone calls. An amazing pre-dawn defense packed the square with thousands of people. Brookfield stood down and the eviction was averted.
Today rumors are rampant that the city is again considering action to end the occupation. Labor leaders, local elected officials, and news outlets are hearing the rumblings of eviction. We know that when the next eviction attempt comes, we will not get advanced warning. NYPD could move in as early as tonight, or it could be next week. We know that our adversaries are trying to build political cover for eviction by demonizing us in the press.
We need to be ready to defend the occupation. Be prepared!"
--------------------------------
Do the "Occupy" rodents own Zuccotti Park ? No. Are these animals paying rent to the Brookfield company for the use of its land ? No. Is the "Occupy" bowel movement paying its "fair share" of taxes to the New York Collective ? (There are reports that it has received over $500,000 in donations.) No. Is the "Occupy" mob paying taxes to the Federal Leviathan ? No. What gives them the right to police their own, like they supposedly did after the sexual assaults and thefts in Cleveland and Wall Street ? Nothing. What gives them the right to deal dope and do it right on the street ? No law I'm aware of. What gives these waste-oids the right to riot the way they did in Oakland ? Nada. What gives the "Occupy" movement the right to create its own society within society ?
The "Occupy" movement doesn't have the right to do any of these things, just like I don't have the right to do any of them. They're crimes. The First Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to do any of these things, either. Either we're a society of law and order or we're not. Individuals can't just grant themselves rights and then act accordingly. Our rights are granted by our Creator (regardless of what the criminals at the ACLU think) not by man. The moment we start thinking otherwise, our society will decay even more than it already has.
The solution to this is very simple. The governors of the states with "Occupy" movements should make a statement that states the wastes of skin have 24 hours to pack up and go home. If this reasonable demand is not met, the governors should use the National Guard to remove them, using force if necessary. The imaginary rights the "Occupy" gang have given themselves don't matter. What matters are the actual rights of the citizens who live the cities where the "Occupy" protests sprang up. The actual rights are the ones being violated by the Occupy fascists and the governments of these states must respond.
-------------------------
"If some 'pacifist' society renounced the use of retaliatory use of force, it would be left helplessly at the mercy of the first thug who decided to be immoral. Such a society would achieve the opposite of its intention: instead of abolishing evil, it would encourage and reward it."
Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to deal dope.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to steal.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to trash a Whole Foods store.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to "occupy" a public place.
-----------------------------------
I'm going to say something that some may find controversial. I'm going to say something that should have been said weeks ago. I'm going to say what needs to be said about the "Occupy Wall Street" barbarians, consequences be damned, criticism be damned.
It's time for the National Guard to come in and bust some skulls.
Let me repeat that so there is no misunderstanding:
It's time for the National Guard to come in and bust some skulls.
I know, I know. I'm a reactionary. I'm an old fart. Blah, blah, blah, 2+2=5, yadda, yadda, yadda, I'm a Zionist tool of the Federal Reserve, yeah, yeah, I got it.
See folks, the truth of the matter is this: the "Occupy" movement is NOT a political protest in any way, shape, or form. It's a civil disturbance. It may be the slowest populist riot in world history, but it's a riot nonetheless. The "Occupy Wall Street" protests must be shut down. Obviously, peacefully shutting down the protests is preferable, but if that's not possible, force should be used. (Whether liberals like Chairman Obama and Ron Paul like it or not.)
I know there will be some who will say I'm playing partisan games. After all, I'm a Constitutional Conservative Patriot and the bottom feeders in the "Occupy" movement are leftist piles of human debris. That's not the case at all. I'm not saying the "Occupy" movement should be stopped because of their beliefs. (Most of them are too stoned to know why they're there in the first place.) Communists, anarchists, and Nazis have held rallies in the US for decades and have never gained any traction since the US is a center-right Conservative country. I have no fear of these morons spreading propaganda or influencing the 2012 election. America has been down this road many times. There was the Socialist and anarchist movements in the late 1800's and early 1900's. There was the Communist Movement in the 1930's. There were the Nazi Bundists in the 1940's. The Weather Underground, led by Chairman Obama's ghost writer Bill Ayers, created all kinds of Marxist-Leninist havoc in the 1960's and early 1970's. None of these movements gained steam back then, just like the "Occupy" twits won't gain any now. Their beliefs don't bother me.
Their actions do.
From the "official" Occupy Wall Street website:
-----------------------------------
"Sign up for the eviction defense text blast!
Send a text to the number 23559, with the the message @occupyalert
This will be used for emergency alerts and announcements.
Three weeks ago NYPD delivered what was effectively a notice of eviction, telling residents of Liberty Square that Brookfield, with the help of the city, was going to clean the park. Instead, #OWS mobilized, organizing a mass clean up, mobilizing thousands of supporters, and flooding the mayors office with phone calls. An amazing pre-dawn defense packed the square with thousands of people. Brookfield stood down and the eviction was averted.
Today rumors are rampant that the city is again considering action to end the occupation. Labor leaders, local elected officials, and news outlets are hearing the rumblings of eviction. We know that when the next eviction attempt comes, we will not get advanced warning. NYPD could move in as early as tonight, or it could be next week. We know that our adversaries are trying to build political cover for eviction by demonizing us in the press.
We need to be ready to defend the occupation. Be prepared!"
http://occupywallst.org/forum/eviction-defense/
--------------------------------
Do the "Occupy" rodents own Zuccotti Park ? No. Are these animals paying rent to the Brookfield company for the use of its land ? No. Is the "Occupy" bowel movement paying its "fair share" of taxes to the New York Collective ? (There are reports that it has received over $500,000 in donations.) No. Is the "Occupy" mob paying taxes to the Federal Leviathan ? No. What gives them the right to police their own, like they supposedly did after the sexual assaults and thefts in Cleveland and Wall Street ? Nothing. What gives them the right to deal dope and do it right on the street ? No law I'm aware of. What gives these waste-oids the right to riot the way they did in Oakland ? Nada. What gives the "Occupy" movement the right to create its own society within society ?
The "Occupy" movement doesn't have the right to do any of these things, just like I don't have the right to do any of them. They're crimes. The First Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to do any of these things, either. Either we're a society of law and order or we're not. Individuals can't just grant themselves rights and then act accordingly. Our rights are granted by our Creator (regardless of what the criminals at the ACLU think) not by man. The moment we start thinking otherwise, our society will decay even more than it already has.
The solution to this is very simple. The governors of the states with "Occupy" movements should make a statement that states the wastes of skin have 24 hours to pack up and go home. If this reasonable demand is not met, the governors should use the National Guard to remove them, using force if necessary. The imaginary rights the "Occupy" gang have given themselves don't matter. What matters are the actual rights of the citizens who live the cities where the "Occupy" protests sprang up. The actual rights are the ones being violated by the Occupy fascists and the governments of these states must respond.
-------------------------
"If some 'pacifist' society renounced the use of retaliatory use of force, it would be left helplessly at the mercy of the first thug who decided to be immoral. Such a society would achieve the opposite of its intention: instead of abolishing evil, it would encourage and reward it."
Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness
Friday, October 14, 2011
Mr. Cain, I Feel Your Pain
From the ignorant mouth of Princeton "professor" Cornel West:
-----------------------------------
“Well, one, black people have been working hard for decades. I think he [Republican Primary frontrunner Herman Cain] needs to get off the symbolic crack pipe and acknowledge that the evidence is overwhelming. I think he also knows that if brother Anthony [The murderer's first name was Troy, "professor". I'm sure he's enjoying the Eternal Flames right about now, since he was guilty as can be.] Davis, a brother who was just put to death, were a white Wall Street banker brother, that the response in the nation would have been very different, as opposed to being a poor black brother. And that’s just one small example, one very small example of that, of racism still at work holding people back.”
http://www.eurweb.com/2011/10/cornel-west-to-herman-cain-get-off-the-crack-pipe-video/
-----------------------------------
From the even more ignorant mouth of washed up singer Harry Belafonte, as reported by the leftist website Politico:
-----------------------------------
"Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain can rule out a celebrity endorsement from Harry Belafonte. During an interview with HLN’s Joy Behar posted online on Monday, the legendary singer slammed Cain for saying that racism doesn’t hold Americans back 'in a big way' anymore.
'Well, you know, it’s very hard to comment on somebody who is so denied intelligence and certainly someone who is as denied a view of history such as he reveals. He knows very little,' said Belafonte. 'Because he happened to have had good fortune, because he happened to have had a moment when he broke through – the moment someone blinked – does not make him the authority on the plight of people of color.'
Belafonte pointed to the disproportionate number of African Americans who are imprisoned or unemployed as proof against Cain’s statement. And he went on to say that Cain just isn’t the type of politician that the black community needs.
'The Republican party, the Tea Party, all those forces to the extreme right have consistently tried to come up with representations for what they call black, what they call the real N-groes,' he said, naming former Secretaries of State Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell as examples. 'They’re heroes for some people. But for a lot of us, they’re not. Herman Cain is just the latest incarnation of what is totally false for the needs of our community and the needs of our nation. I think he’s a bad apple. And people should look at his hole card. He’s not what he says he is.”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/click/1011/Harry_Belafonte_calls_Herman_Cain_a_bad_apple.html
-----------------------------------
Mr. Cain, I feel your pain.
Well, not exactly. I'm not black nor am I running for president. But like Herman Cain, I'm a minority Conservative. I'm Jewish. (Or, in Ron Paulista-speak, a "neocon Zionist conspirator".) I know what it's like to have others with the same ethnic background verbally attack me. I've been called a Nazi collaborator, a kapo, and my wife has been referred to as a shiksa. I've even had family members point to pictures of other family members who were lost in the Holocaust and been told that my political views dishonored them. Several times, I've been forced to walk out of of synagogues when the rabbi decided to shill for lib-ism and the Democrat party. I may be one tough hombre, but trust me crap like this can hurt, deep down. (Just as I'm sure some of the venom from Race Baiting Left bothers Herman Cain deep down as well.)
Win, lose, or draw, Herman Cain's campaign will always be near and dear to my heart. (No, I'm not shilling for him or telling you to vote for him. You're an adult. You certainly don't need me to tell you who to vote for, True Believer. Just make sure it's not Cut and Run Paul or Myth Romney, OK ?) Cain's campaign proves, once and for all, that Conservatism is truly color blind, and not in some hippie-dippie, multicultural lib way. Unlike Chairman Obama in 2008, Cain is not running as a black man, he's running as an American patriot who happens to black. If that's not inspirational and patriotic, I don't know what is.
I feel yor pain, Mr. Cain. And like you, it's made me stronger.
-----------------------------------
“Well, one, black people have been working hard for decades. I think he [Republican Primary frontrunner Herman Cain] needs to get off the symbolic crack pipe and acknowledge that the evidence is overwhelming. I think he also knows that if brother Anthony [The murderer's first name was Troy, "professor". I'm sure he's enjoying the Eternal Flames right about now, since he was guilty as can be.] Davis, a brother who was just put to death, were a white Wall Street banker brother, that the response in the nation would have been very different, as opposed to being a poor black brother. And that’s just one small example, one very small example of that, of racism still at work holding people back.”
http://www.eurweb.com/2011/10/cornel-west-to-herman-cain-get-off-the-crack-pipe-video/
-----------------------------------
From the even more ignorant mouth of washed up singer Harry Belafonte, as reported by the leftist website Politico:
-----------------------------------
"Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain can rule out a celebrity endorsement from Harry Belafonte. During an interview with HLN’s Joy Behar posted online on Monday, the legendary singer slammed Cain for saying that racism doesn’t hold Americans back 'in a big way' anymore.
'Well, you know, it’s very hard to comment on somebody who is so denied intelligence and certainly someone who is as denied a view of history such as he reveals. He knows very little,' said Belafonte. 'Because he happened to have had good fortune, because he happened to have had a moment when he broke through – the moment someone blinked – does not make him the authority on the plight of people of color.'
Belafonte pointed to the disproportionate number of African Americans who are imprisoned or unemployed as proof against Cain’s statement. And he went on to say that Cain just isn’t the type of politician that the black community needs.
'The Republican party, the Tea Party, all those forces to the extreme right have consistently tried to come up with representations for what they call black, what they call the real N-groes,' he said, naming former Secretaries of State Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell as examples. 'They’re heroes for some people. But for a lot of us, they’re not. Herman Cain is just the latest incarnation of what is totally false for the needs of our community and the needs of our nation. I think he’s a bad apple. And people should look at his hole card. He’s not what he says he is.”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/click/1011/Harry_Belafonte_calls_Herman_Cain_a_bad_apple.html
-----------------------------------
Mr. Cain, I feel your pain.
Well, not exactly. I'm not black nor am I running for president. But like Herman Cain, I'm a minority Conservative. I'm Jewish. (Or, in Ron Paulista-speak, a "neocon Zionist conspirator".) I know what it's like to have others with the same ethnic background verbally attack me. I've been called a Nazi collaborator, a kapo, and my wife has been referred to as a shiksa. I've even had family members point to pictures of other family members who were lost in the Holocaust and been told that my political views dishonored them. Several times, I've been forced to walk out of of synagogues when the rabbi decided to shill for lib-ism and the Democrat party. I may be one tough hombre, but trust me crap like this can hurt, deep down. (Just as I'm sure some of the venom from Race Baiting Left bothers Herman Cain deep down as well.)
Win, lose, or draw, Herman Cain's campaign will always be near and dear to my heart. (No, I'm not shilling for him or telling you to vote for him. You're an adult. You certainly don't need me to tell you who to vote for, True Believer. Just make sure it's not Cut and Run Paul or Myth Romney, OK ?) Cain's campaign proves, once and for all, that Conservatism is truly color blind, and not in some hippie-dippie, multicultural lib way. Unlike Chairman Obama in 2008, Cain is not running as a black man, he's running as an American patriot who happens to black. If that's not inspirational and patriotic, I don't know what is.
I feel yor pain, Mr. Cain. And like you, it's made me stronger.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
DO NOT WRITE ABOUT THINGS YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.
When I get ready to write this column, I have a little ritual. The first thing I do is play UFC Champion Dan Severn's theme when he was a pro wrestler with the WWF. (I'll call it whatever I want, treehuggers.) Next, I spend about 20 seconds spinning my dreidel on one of Ron Paul's books. Then I'll pace the floor for about 20-30 seconds. Finally, after I convince my wife Jenny not to Baker Act me, I say these these magic words before I begin writing:
DO NOT WRITE ABOUT THINGS YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.
See folks, I don't write about the proper care of manatees in captivity because I have don't have the slightest clue what it entails. I don't make blistering comments about the floral industry, since the only facts I know about it is Jenny has been a florist her entire adult life and her favorite flower is a gerbera daisy. I stick to what I know: Chairman Obama is a fascist pig who must be defeated in 2012, Liberals and RINOs are beyond contempt, Ron Paul is a McGovernite fraud, the federal government is a rogue entity unto itself, and George $oros is the most dangerous man in the world. (And a Nazi collaborator, but I digress.)
Someone, really, really needs to teach this valuable trick to Mike Lupica of the NY Daily Snooze.
When Keith Olbermann's Apprentice is not witing about sports (which he does very poorly. He's one of those lunkheads who will waste thousands of words explaining the social implications of the two-point conversion in the NFL. Lupica is the type of sportswriter that has made Sports Illustrated unreadable), he moonlights as a liberal hack.
From his column in the 10/10/11 NY Daily Snooze:
-----------------------------------
"Here is a phony named Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, a dull young congressman clearly aspiring to be an even duller presidential candidate someday, calling the Occupy Wall Street people a 'mob.'
Oh, sure. Cantor makes it sound as if he can't get a good night's sleep these days worrying about the 'growing mobs occupying Wall Street and other cities across our country.' He then goes on to say that 'some in [Washington] have condoned pitting Americans against Americans.'
So in Cantor's world the Tea Party is an exciting grass-roots movement and Occupy Wall Street is a bunch of seditionists. Here is what he really means when he worries about Americans being pitted against other Americans:
People who don't think like him being a clear and present danger to people who do."
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/10/10/2011-10-10_its_a_mob_just_for_differing_with_you.html
-----------------------------------
As we can see, Lupica is out of his depth. Lupica didn't write that out of sheer Progressivik venom, like say, a Markos Moulitsas or Ed "The Red" Schultz. (If he did, he would have tried to justify the psychotic behavior.) He wrote that slop out of sheer ignorance. A quick Google seach would have shown thousands upon thousands of articles about how the Occupy Wall Street barbarians are, in fact, a mob. There's countless images of the reject who took a dump on a cop car. There are countless images of the filth that the OWS crowd is leaving behind. There are thousands of hours of video showing the OWS mob chanting antsemitic slurs. (It's as if Ann Coulter's book, Demonic, came to life.) I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Mike Lupica has nothing in common with these protesters. He has no idea what's motivating them. He's Ray Barone and the OWS demolition derby is Che Guevara on a bad acid trip.
Mikey, do yourself a favor. Go back to writing about how Mickey Mantle didn't deserve his transplanted liver and be the lone vote against Brett Farve entering the NFL Hall of Fame. Go cry about the designated hitter and violence in the NHL. Above all, Mikey---
DO NOT WRITE ABOUT THINGS YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.
DO NOT WRITE ABOUT THINGS YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.
See folks, I don't write about the proper care of manatees in captivity because I have don't have the slightest clue what it entails. I don't make blistering comments about the floral industry, since the only facts I know about it is Jenny has been a florist her entire adult life and her favorite flower is a gerbera daisy. I stick to what I know: Chairman Obama is a fascist pig who must be defeated in 2012, Liberals and RINOs are beyond contempt, Ron Paul is a McGovernite fraud, the federal government is a rogue entity unto itself, and George $oros is the most dangerous man in the world. (And a Nazi collaborator, but I digress.)
Someone, really, really needs to teach this valuable trick to Mike Lupica of the NY Daily Snooze.
When Keith Olbermann's Apprentice is not witing about sports (which he does very poorly. He's one of those lunkheads who will waste thousands of words explaining the social implications of the two-point conversion in the NFL. Lupica is the type of sportswriter that has made Sports Illustrated unreadable), he moonlights as a liberal hack.
From his column in the 10/10/11 NY Daily Snooze:
-----------------------------------
"Here is a phony named Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, a dull young congressman clearly aspiring to be an even duller presidential candidate someday, calling the Occupy Wall Street people a 'mob.'
Oh, sure. Cantor makes it sound as if he can't get a good night's sleep these days worrying about the 'growing mobs occupying Wall Street and other cities across our country.' He then goes on to say that 'some in [Washington] have condoned pitting Americans against Americans.'
So in Cantor's world the Tea Party is an exciting grass-roots movement and Occupy Wall Street is a bunch of seditionists. Here is what he really means when he worries about Americans being pitted against other Americans:
People who don't think like him being a clear and present danger to people who do."
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/10/10/2011-10-10_its_a_mob_just_for_differing_with_you.html
-----------------------------------
As we can see, Lupica is out of his depth. Lupica didn't write that out of sheer Progressivik venom, like say, a Markos Moulitsas or Ed "The Red" Schultz. (If he did, he would have tried to justify the psychotic behavior.) He wrote that slop out of sheer ignorance. A quick Google seach would have shown thousands upon thousands of articles about how the Occupy Wall Street barbarians are, in fact, a mob. There's countless images of the reject who took a dump on a cop car. There are countless images of the filth that the OWS crowd is leaving behind. There are thousands of hours of video showing the OWS mob chanting antsemitic slurs. (It's as if Ann Coulter's book, Demonic, came to life.) I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Mike Lupica has nothing in common with these protesters. He has no idea what's motivating them. He's Ray Barone and the OWS demolition derby is Che Guevara on a bad acid trip.
Mikey, do yourself a favor. Go back to writing about how Mickey Mantle didn't deserve his transplanted liver and be the lone vote against Brett Farve entering the NFL Hall of Fame. Go cry about the designated hitter and violence in the NHL. Above all, Mikey---
DO NOT WRITE ABOUT THINGS YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)